SCOUT· 64%48m·2026-08-18·RelationshipsPamela Smart: Should She Get A New Trial?
Part 2: Pamela Smart’s fate came down to a question that still hangs over the case: Who should the jury believe? In Part 2 of Pamela Smart: Should She Get A New Trial? Mystery & Murder: Analysis by Dr. Phil, Dr. Phil examines the testimony that helped convict Smart of conspiring to murder her husband, Gregg Smart.…
Scout bees are checking it out — divided opinions, the swarm hasn't committed.
- Platform
- 48%
- Community
- 65%
- Value
- 85%
Buzzmeter says it's buzzing across platforms — the Hive Vote says whether the people who actually listened liked it.
Rate this episode
Add your vote to the Hive — listeners rate every episode after they finish.
- No reviews yet — be the first.
What people are saying
“It really makes me mad when everybody skips the fact that she’s a child predator.”
“I also fall asleep to Dr Phil’s podcasts😂. His voice and the pace is right for me.”
“While I believe in capital punishment for crimes such as this, I also believe in redemption, repentance, and rehabilitation. I would say that Smart deserves at least a hearing on her request. I should like to believe that she is sincere and…”
“Celia received reward money also as I recall.”
Similar episodes from other shows
More like The Dr. Phil Podcast →
The Pamela Smart Case (Part 1)
46%Lindsay Clancy: Drama in the Deliberation Room
78%The Experts Couldn’t Agree — Psychologist Dr. John Matthias Breaks Down WHY | Lindsay Clancy Trial
Broken Vows (Rebroadcast)
One great episode in your inbox, daily — free.
One email a day, unsubscribe anytime. No spam, ever.