BUZZING· 75%1h 21m·2026-09-06·True CrimeThe Experts Couldn’t Agree — Psychologist Dr. John Matthias Breaks Down WHY | Lindsay Clancy Trial
The Lindsay Clancy trial ended in a mistrial, but one of the biggest questions remains: how could the psychologists and psychiatrists who evaluated Lindsay Clancy reach such different conclusions? Hidden True Crime’s Lauren Matthias sits down with clinical and forensic psychologist Dr. John Matthias to examine the…
Active swarm energy. Strong reception, real community buzz.
- Platform
- 63%
- Community
- 90%
- Value
- no read yet
Buzzmeter says it's buzzing across platforms — the Hive Vote says whether the people who actually listened liked it.
Rate this episode
Add your vote to the Hive — listeners rate every episode after they finish.
- No reviews yet — be the first.
What people are saying
“Appreciate Dr Mathias perspectives. Thank you both.”
“I love the way Lauren looks at Dr. John when he is talking passionately. You can just see the love and respect she has for her husband. It’s so sweet. These two are a great team!”
“I was really hoping we’d hear from Dr.John about this 🙏”
“My daughter had voices didn't say anything She didn't want to be committed”
More from Hidden True Crime
See all episodes →
84%Criminal Psychologist REACTS to Lindsay Clancy: Did She Know What She Was Doing?
79%Forensic Psychologist Takes the Stand in Lindsay Clancy Trial - Interview with Dr Leslie Dobson
77%EXCLUSIVE: I had Postpartum Psychosis and Intrusive Thoughts--I was scared | Lindsay Clancy Case
Similar episodes from other shows
More like Hidden True Crime →
The Perfect Collapse: The Verdict
The Lindsay Clancy Trial: What Doesn't Add Up?
65%Treating Lindsay Clancy
The Lindsay Clancy Trial Mini Series: The Defence's Case
One great episode in your inbox, daily — free.
One email a day, unsubscribe anytime. No spam, ever.