

ONE JUROR: Inside the 11–1 Split That Derailed the Lindsay Clancy Trial Into a Mistrial
The Lindsay Clancy trial has ended in a mistrial after seven days of deliberations—and Lauren Matthias breaks down the explosive 11–1 jury split, the holdout juror accused of refusing to properly apply reasonable doubt, and the defense’s emergency appeal to the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court. We examine the…

Scout bees are checking it out — divided opinions, the swarm hasn't committed.
- Platform
- 61%
- Community
- 65%
- Value
- no read yet
Buzzmeter says it's buzzing across platforms — the Hive Vote says whether the people who actually listened liked it.
Rate this episode
Add your vote to the Hive — listeners rate every episode after they finish.
- No reviews yet — be the first.
What people are saying
“Remember jury equity. Jurors have a right to vote with their conscience”
“My empathy and understanding is for her own 3 children she brutally murdered.”
“The standard of proof is "beyond a reasonable doubt", NOT "beyond all shadow of a doubt". IF the juror thought "I'm almost certain she knew what she was doing was wrong. Is it possible she was under psychosis? Possibly, but I believe it's m…”
“hold out juror…? how about protecting the 3 innocent little lives…”
More from Hidden True Crime
See all episodes →
Criminal Psychologist REACTS to Lindsay Clancy: Did She Know What She Was Doing?

Forensic Psychologist Takes the Stand in Lindsay Clancy Trial - Interview with Dr Leslie Dobson

EXCLUSIVE: I had Postpartum Psychosis and Intrusive Thoughts--I was scared | Lindsay Clancy Case
Similar episodes from other shows
More like Hidden True Crime →
Lindsay Clancy: Drama in the Deliberation Room

The Trial of Lindsay Clancy - Mistrial

Lindsay Clancy trial | Breaking down the jury's deadlock note and what's next

The Perfect Collapse: Patrick Clancy's Day Two Testimony BONUS EPISODE
One great episode in your inbox, daily — free.
One email a day, unsubscribe anytime. No spam, ever.