Could the Holdout Controversy Stop a Second Trial? | Lindsay Clancy
The Lindsay Clancy case is far from over after a mistrial and an 11–1 jury split. Hidden True Crime’s Lauren Matthias breaks down the post-trial hearing, Judge Sullivan’s denial of the defense’s request for a finding of not guilty, and Kevin Reddington’s surprising argument questioning whether prosecutors proved…
We score an episode from what we can actually measure — its reach and engagement, what listeners say about it, and what it covers. We don't have those signals for this one yet, so it doesn't get a number.
Buzzmeter says it's buzzing across platforms — the Hive Vote says whether the people who actually listened liked it.
Rate this episode
Add your vote to the Hive — listeners rate every episode after they finish.
- No reviews yet — be the first.
More from Hidden True Crime
See all episodes →
84%Criminal Psychologist REACTS to Lindsay Clancy: Did She Know What She Was Doing?
79%Forensic Psychologist Takes the Stand in Lindsay Clancy Trial - Interview with Dr Leslie Dobson
78%The Experts Couldn’t Agree — Psychologist Dr. John Matthias Breaks Down WHY | Lindsay Clancy Trial
Similar episodes from other shows
More like Hidden True Crime →
43%The Lindsay Clancy Mini Series: An Unexpected Update
The Lone Holdout
Lindsay Clancy case | What we learned at the first hearing since the trial
The Trial of Lindsay Clancy - “Where is the evidence?”
One great episode in your inbox, daily — free.
One email a day, unsubscribe anytime. No spam, ever.