Lindsay Clancy trial | Final rebuttal witnesses paint defendant as unreliable narrator
A forensic psychologist said Tuesday that he believed the Duxbury mother to be criminally responsible for murder in the deaths of her three children, while a forensic psychiatrist called her account of her mental state into question. Our legal experts discuss the impact the testimony will have when jurors deliberate.…
We score an episode from what we can actually measure — its reach and engagement, what listeners say about it, and what it covers. We don't have those signals for this one yet, so it doesn't get a number.
Buzzmeter says it's buzzing across platforms — the Hive Vote says whether the people who actually listened liked it.
Rate this episode
Add your vote to the Hive — listeners rate every episode after they finish.
- No reviews yet — be the first.
More from The Lindsay Clancy Trial: Commonwealth Confidential
See all episodes →
35%Lindsay Clancy trial | Jurors weighing verdict in landmark case
31%How evaluating criminal responsibility in court works (extended interview)
30%Lindsay Clancy trial | How would the case differ in the UK?
Similar episodes from other shows
More like The Lindsay Clancy Trial: Commonwealth Confidential →
58%Inside the Final Days of the Lindsay Clancy Trial
Trial Day 16
49%The Lindsay Clancy Trial Mini Series: The Defence's Case
68%Two Psychiatrists, Two VERY Different Conclusions About Lindsay Clancy | Trial Day 18
One great episode in your inbox, daily — free.
One email a day, unsubscribe anytime. No spam, ever.