Closing argument analysis: 'no collision' vs. 'no boogeyman'
Karen Read's fate is now in the hands of the jury, after eight weeks of testimony and dramatic closing arguments. Here's what happened in court Friday — a legal breakdown of the lawyers' arguments and how they went over in court. Plus, Ronald Estanislao, a juror from the first trial, gives his take on the now…
We score an episode from what we can actually measure — its reach and engagement, what listeners say about it, and what it covers. We don't have those signals for this one yet, so it doesn't get a number.
Buzzmeter says it's buzzing across platforms — the Hive Vote says whether the people who actually listened liked it.
Rate this episode
Add your vote to the Hive — listeners rate every episode after they finish.
- No reviews yet — be the first.
More from The Lindsay Clancy Trial: Commonwealth Confidential
See all episodes →Lindsay Clancy trial | Analyzing the case so far and the judge's instructions to jurors
Lindsay Clancy trial | What jurors heard about her thinking
Lindsay Clancy trial | Mental health remains in focus during emotional day of testimony
Similar episodes from other shows
More like The Lindsay Clancy Trial: Commonwealth Confidential →
258. Karen Read and the Death of John O'Keefe Part 7
290: Karen Read VERDICT: NOT GUILTY on All Major Charges!
Center of the Storm
Karen Read’s First Exclusive Interview After MURDER ACQUITTAL - What REALLY Happened At 34 Fairview
One great episode in your inbox, daily — free.
One email a day, unsubscribe anytime. No spam, ever.