How to Inoculate Against Misinformation: Breaking Down Misleading Arguments & Why Science Communication Fails with John Cook
Humans aren't rational. We don't evaluate facts objectively; instead, we interpret them through our biases, experiences, and backgrounds. What's more, we're psychologically motivated to reject or distort information that threatens our identity or worldview – even if it's scientifically valid. Add to that our modern…
We score an episode from what we can actually measure — its reach and engagement, what listeners say about it, and what it covers. We don't have those signals for this one yet, so it doesn't get a number.
Buzzmeter says it's buzzing across platforms — the Hive Vote says whether the people who actually listened liked it.
Rate this episode
Add your vote to the Hive — listeners rate every episode after they finish.
- No reviews yet — be the first.
More from The Great Simplification with Nate Hagens
See all episodes →
84%The Villains We Choose and the Work They Give Us | Frankly 155
84%Unordinary Interventions: How to Plant Seeds for a Better Future | Frankly 154
83%Our Best "Invention": What Dogs Reveal About the Metacrisis | Frankly 156
Similar episodes from other shows
More like The Great Simplification with Nate Hagens →
Climate Change Deniers
David McRaney || How Minds Change
The real-world danger of online myths | Vidhya Ramalingam
The psychology of science denial, doubt and disbelief, with Gale Sinatra, PhD, and Barbara Hofer, PhD
One great episode in your inbox, daily — free.
One email a day, unsubscribe anytime. No spam, ever.