

Patrick Clancy's First Interview: What It Revealed and What the Internet Got Wrong About Him.
In Part 6 of Mother on Trial: Inside the Lindsay Clancy Case, Mystery and Murder: Analysis by Dr. Phil, Dr. Phil and producer Sara Carden examine the latest developments following the mistrial. The reported holdout juror is now pushing back on claims that he refused to follow the law, saying he never had reasonable…

Scout bees are checking it out — divided opinions, the swarm hasn't committed.
- Platform
- 52%
- Community
- 35%
- Value
- no read yet
Buzzmeter says it's buzzing across platforms — the Hive Vote says whether the people who actually listened liked it.
Rate this episode
Add your vote to the Hive — listeners rate every episode after they finish.
- No reviews yet — be the first.
What people are saying
“It should not matter if Lindsey.Clancy is nsane or not because killing three kids should not be justified, rationalized or excused.”
“I believe the juror has every right to make his decision based on his beliefs and evidence provided. You are not sat as a juror to go along with the majority. He must have his reasons and we must respect it.”
“The other jurors exposed that they actively ignored the prosecution from the opening statements.”
“I thought jurors were supposed to be honest and vote how they feel is right Not be swayed by peer pressure”
Similar episodes from other shows
More like The Dr. Phil Podcast →
The Lindsay Clancy Mini Series: An Unexpected Update

The Holdout Juror SPEAKS — And The Defense’s fight to Stop a Retrial for Lindsay Clancy

Lindsay Clancy Trial Ends in MISTRIAL as Jury Remains Deadlocked with One Single Holdout Juror

Lindsay Clancy: Drama in the Deliberation Room
One great episode in your inbox, daily — free.
One email a day, unsubscribe anytime. No spam, ever.


