AI Safety Language Is Destroying the Debate | Steven Sinofsky
a16z Board Partner and former Microsoft Windows president Steven Sinofsky joins Theo Jaffee and Sofia Puccini on MTS to argue that the language we use to describe AI failures is making it harder to understand what’s actually going wrong. Steven takes aim at terms like “alignment,” “goal-seeking,” and “rogue agents,”…
We score an episode from what we can actually measure — its reach and engagement, what listeners say about it, and what it covers. We don't have those signals for this one yet, so it doesn't get a number.
Buzzmeter says it's buzzing across platforms — the Hive Vote says whether the people who actually listened liked it.
Rate this episode
Add your vote to the Hive — listeners rate every episode after they finish.
- No reviews yet — be the first.
More from The a16z Show
See all episodes →
Similar episodes from other shows
More like The a16z Show →
Should We Be Scared of Anthropic's Mythos?
The coming AI security crisis (and what to do about it) | Sander Schulhoff
Bret Taylor: A Vision for AI’s Next Frontier
What the OpenAI-Hugging Face Hack Really Tells Us About AI Danger
One great episode in your inbox, daily — free.
One email a day, unsubscribe anytime. No spam, ever.