How to Have Meaningful Dialogues Despite Political Differences with Tania Israel, PhD
As the 2020 election cycle heats up, so will conversations among family, friends and acquaintances on opposite ends of the political spectrum. The United States may be more politically polarized than ever, but political disagreements don’t have to devolve into shouting matches and ideological one-upmanship. For people…
We score an episode from what we can actually measure — its reach and engagement, what listeners say about it, and what it covers. We don't have those signals for this one yet, so it doesn't get a number.
Buzzmeter says it's buzzing across platforms — the Hive Vote says whether the people who actually listened liked it.
Rate this episode
Add your vote to the Hive — listeners rate every episode after they finish.
- No reviews yet — be the first.
More from Speaking of Psychology
See all episodes →
Encore: Why psychopathy is more common than you think, with Abigail Marsh, PhD
Encore: How living with secrets can harm you, with Michael Slepian, PhD
Encore: Why you should aim to be a “good enough” parent, with Tim Cavell, PhD, and Lauren Quetsch, PhD
Similar episodes from other shows
More like Speaking of Psychology →
How to have better political conversations | Robb Willer
You Probably Shouldn’t Say That. And Yet…(Groundbreaking Science of Disagreeing Well) | Julia Minson
How to Have Hard Conversations with Celeste Headlee
169. Can We Disagree Better?
One great episode in your inbox, daily — free.
One email a day, unsubscribe anytime. No spam, ever.