285 | Nate Silver on Prediction, Risk, and Rationality
Being rational necessarily involves engagement with probability. Given two possible courses of action, it can be rational to prefer the one that could possibly result in a worse outcome, if there's also a substantial probability for an even better outcome. But one's attitude toward risk -- averse, tolerant, or even…
We score an episode from what we can actually measure — its reach and engagement, what listeners say about it, and what it covers. We don't have those signals for this one yet, so it doesn't get a number.
Buzzmeter says it's buzzing across platforms — the Hive Vote says whether the people who actually listened liked it.
Rate this episode
Add your vote to the Hive — listeners rate every episode after they finish.
- No reviews yet — be the first.
More from Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas
See all episodes →
74%359 | Solo: Theories of Dark Energy
74%349 | Daniel Harlow on What Quantum Gravity Teaches Us About Quantum Mechanics
73%363 | Chandra Sripada on How LLMs and Humans are Cognitive Cousins
Similar episodes from other shows
More like Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas →
#389 — The Politics of Risk
Steven Pinker || Why Rationality Matters
Certainty Is Overrated
Nate Silver Is Still Gambling with His Reputation
One great episode in your inbox, daily — free.
One email a day, unsubscribe anytime. No spam, ever.